{"id":10187,"date":"2026-01-01T05:14:34","date_gmt":"2026-01-01T03:14:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/?p=10187"},"modified":"2026-01-01T10:58:48","modified_gmt":"2026-01-01T08:58:48","slug":"zahyst-prav-uchasnykiv-vid-nerivnyh-vymog-u-publichnyh-zakupivlyah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/zahyst-prav-uchasnykiv-vid-nerivnyh-vymog-u-publichnyh-zakupivlyah\/","title":{"rendered":"Protecting the rights of bidders from unequal requirements in public procurement"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ukraine's public procurement system is designed to ensure fair competition, transparency and budgetary savings. However, in practice, procuring entities often include in tender documents discriminatory requirements<\/strong>The conditions that unreasonably restrict business participation. Such conditions are contrary to the Law of Ukraine \"On Public Procurement\" and can be challenged through the permanent administrative board of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU).<\/p>\n

In this article, we will look at how to identify discriminatory requirements, what protection mechanisms exist, and how businesses can effectively defend their rights.<\/p>\n

\n

What are discriminatory requirements in procurement?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The following requirements of the tender documentation are discriminatory:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • \n

    limit the range of potential participants;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    create advantages for individual companies;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    not related to the subject of procurement;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    have no objective and rational justification.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The most common examples:<\/p>\n

      \n
    • \n

      requirement to provide certificates that are not mandatory<\/strong> in accordance with the law;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      availability requirements Excessive number of equipment or employees<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      requirement of performance experience identical<\/strong>rather than similar agreements;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      the requirement to provide certificates that impossible to obtain in principle<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      installation excessively tight deadlines<\/strong> performance of work or delivery of goods;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

    • \n

      the requirement to have production facilities in a particular region without proper motivation.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Such conditions narrow competition and violate procurement principles.<\/p>\n

      \n

      Legal regulation and non-discrimination principles<\/strong><\/h2>\n

      The Law \"On Public Procurement\" clearly states:<\/p>\n

        \n
      • \n

        all participants have equal rights and opportunities<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        to the customer it is prohibited to set discriminatory requirements<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

      • \n

        the tender documentation must comply with the subject of procurement<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

        The AMCU has repeatedly emphasized that customers must prove the necessity of each requirement<\/strong>. If there is no justification, it is considered illegal.<\/p>\n

        \n

        How to recognize a discriminatory requirement?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

        Entrepreneurs should check whether there is a requirement:<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. \n

          Proportional<\/strong> - whether it is necessary for the quality performance of the contract.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        2. \n

          Objective<\/strong> - whether the requirement meets the customer's technical needs.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        3. \n

          Realistic<\/strong> - whether the majority of market participants can fulfill it.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

        4. \n

          Legal<\/strong> - whether it complies with state standards, regulations and laws.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          If at least one criterion is violated, the requirement has signs of discrimination.<\/p>\n

          \n

          Mechanism for appealing against discriminatory requirements<\/strong><\/h2>\n

          1. Analysis of tender documents and preparation of requirements for the customer<\/strong><\/h3>\n

          The first step is to submit a request to the procuring entity to eliminate the illegal condition in the electronic procurement system. The procuring entity is obliged to respond within the timeframe specified by law.
          If it refuses or does not respond, the business has the right to move on to the next stage.<\/p>\n

          \n

          2. Filing a complaint with the AMCU<\/strong><\/h3>\n

          The complaint can be filed until the end of the bid submission period.
          The complaint must contain:<\/p>\n

            \n
          • \n

            description of the violation;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            legal justification;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            references to the law;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            requirements for the customer;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

          • \n

            evidence of discrimination.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

            The complaint is filed electronically through the Prozorro.<\/p>\n

            \n

            3. Review by the Antimonopoly Committee<\/strong><\/h3>\n

            The AMCU Board considers the complaint within 15 working days<\/strong>.
            According to the results, it can:<\/p>\n

              \n
            • \n

              satisfy the complaint<\/strong> and oblige the customer to eliminate the requirement;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

            • \n

              reject the complaint<\/strong>if no violations are found;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

            • \n

              stop the procurement procedure<\/strong> until the violation is eliminated.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

              The AMCU's decision is binding.<\/p>\n

              \n

              Important nuances of the appeal<\/strong><\/h2>\n

              Timing is key<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              If a business has missed the deadline for appealing, it is almost impossible to remedy the situation. Therefore, it is worth checking procurements from the moment they are announced.<\/p>\n

              The cost of filing a complaint<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              There is a fee for filing a complaint. The amount depends on the type of procurement (goods\/services or works). However, this amount is much less than the possible losses due to non-admission to the tender.<\/p>\n

              High-quality justification is the key to success<\/strong><\/h3>\n

              The AMCU pays attention to legal arguments, so it is important to properly formulate a complaint, referring to practice and law.<\/p>\n

              \n

              Practical business tips<\/strong><\/h2>\n
                \n
              1. \n

                Check the documentation immediately after the procurement is announced.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              2. \n

                Record all violations<\/strong> - make copies of documents, keep a history of changes.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              3. \n

                Submit a claim<\/strong> to the customer before filing a complaint.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              4. \n

                Gather the evidence base<\/strong> - expert opinions, market calculations, comparative tables.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

              5. \n

                Prepare a complaint with a lawyer<\/strong>, which specializes in public procurement.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                \n

                Implications for the customer<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                If the requirements are recognized as discriminatory:<\/p>\n

                  \n
                • \n

                  procurement can be stop or cancel<\/strong>;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                • \n

                  the customer is obliged to make changes<\/strong> to the documentation;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

                • \n

                  responsible officials may be held liable for administrative responsibility<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

                  \n

                  Conclusion.<\/strong><\/h2>\n

                  Challenging discriminatory requirements is an effective tool for protecting the rights of public procurement participants. Thanks to the AMCU's mechanism, businesses can really influence the transparency of tenders and prevent unfair practices of procuring entities.<\/p>\n

                  Professional legal support will help you formulate a complaint correctly, meet deadlines, and maximize your chances of having your claims satisfied.<\/p>\n

                  If you need to protect your company's interests in public procurement, we will provide comprehensive legal support and representation at the AMCU.<\/p>\n\n\n

                  \n \n
                  \n \n
                  \n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n
                  \n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n
                  \n \n\n
                  <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n \n\n
                  \n Rate this post<\/span>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                  Ukraine's public procurement system is designed to ensure fair competition, transparency and budgetary savings. However, in practice, procuring entities often include discriminatory requirements in tender documents that unreasonably restrict business participation. Such conditions contradict the Law of Ukraine \"On Public Procurement\" and can be challenged through the permanent administrative board of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (AMCU). In this article, we will consider how [...]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":10188,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10191,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10187\/revisions\/10191"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/axellegal.com.ua\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}